Federal Manager's Daily Report

GSA Acts to Set ‘Minimum Performance Requirements’ for Drinking Straws in Federal Buildings

The GSA has moved to set “minimum performance requirements” for drinking straws to be procured by federal agencies or provided for use in agency facilities under contract, specifying that they must “have the strength and durability of plastic straws,” including comparable “compressive strength.”

A notice in the July 21 Federal Register follows the February posting by GSA of several “deviations” in the FAR to comply with Trump administration executive orders that revoked various Biden administration directives affecting contract awards. One of those, titled Ending Procurement and Forced Use of Paper Straws, barred further procurement of paper drinking straws by federal agencies in favor of plastic straws, and ordered creation of a National Strategy to End the Use of Paper Straws.

Says the notice, “As part of these efforts, the FAR should be updated to include a performance requirement that beverage straws procured and used under federal contracts have the strength and durability of plastic straws and a provision that requires all government contractors to represent that they do not use paper straws or penalize the use of plastic.”

The notice notes that the USDA’s BioPreferred Program requires agencies to “procure sustainable products and services to the maximum extent practicable” and establishes minimum biobased content standards for certain products, including paper straws. However, that does not apply where a biobased product fails to meet performance standards or is not cost effective, it says.

The notice says paper straws are “significantly” more expensive—although it does not specify costs—and cites a study concluding that common paper straws “experienced a 70 to 90 percent reduction in compressive strength” after 30 minutes of exposure to liquid. “As a result, use of paper straws does not achieve the expected level of satisfaction or happiness (utility) an individual should receive from consuming their beverage,” it says.

It adds that the policy will not apply contracts not issued by using the FAR, such as concession contracts at national parks.

OPM: Impact of RIFs Could Be Much Larger than Commonly Used Numbers. Or Maybe Less.

Uneasy Wait on RIFs Hangs over Federal Workforce; Courts May Yet Play a Role

Agencies Should Weigh Impact on Employees of Return to Worksite, Says Report

Audit: PSHB Program at Risk of Underfunding, Understaffing; No Plan B

Supreme Court Clears Way for Mass RIFs as OPM Cites Wave of ‘Deferred Resignations’

Rubio’s State Department Restructuring Cuts 1,353 Federal Jobs

OPM Wants Supervisors to Produce a ‘Positive and Compliant’ Federal Workplace

See also,

Work Longer or Take the FERS Supplement Now: Which is Better?

Doubling Your TSP (C Fund vs G Fund)

How to Estimate a FERS Special Retirement Supplement (calculator!)

Alternative Federal Retirement Options; With Chart

Primer: Early out, buyout, reduction in force (RIF)

FEDweek Newsletter
Veteran insight on your federal pay, benefits, career and retirement!
Share