Wider Personnel Reform Idea Debated

In the 2006 budget the Bush administration has announced

it will be pushing to reform personnel systems across

government to resemble new systems at the Departments of

Homeland Security and Defense, which limit collective

bargaining and give managers the authority to set employee

compensation based on performance evaluations.


The budget said the two departments need broad personnel

flexibilities to “anticipate and respond quickly to the

changing national needs, and argues those flexibilities

should be extended “to all agencies so that they can make

the greatest use of their personnel to achieve their own

important missions.”


Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Ranking

Member Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., responded to administration

plans to model the personnel systems of other agencies on

DHS and DoD by saying, “we should at least wait and see if

it works,” adding, “the extraordinary flexibility to waive

civil service protections” were granted to DoD and DHS

because of their “unique security mission.”


The Government Accountability Office issued preliminary

observations on the DHS personnel rules – GAO-05-320T –

saying while they are largely consistent with proven

approaches to strategic human capital management, DHS

has considerable work to do to define and understand the

details of implementing the system, central to overall

understanding.


It said DHS looks committed to continued employee and union

involvement throughout the implementation, and that

sustained leadership commitment is needed to sustain the

quality of that involvement.


In testimony before the Homeland and Governmental Affairs

committee, National Treasury Employees Union president

Colleen Kelley objected to the DHS rules saying they

“create an environment of mistrust and uncertainty,”

calling them “unlawful” for not meeting certain

collective bargaining and appeal provisions, and said

the pay for performance program gives the secretary

“unfettered discretion to create a list of mandatory

removal offenses,” that could only be appealed to an

internal board.

FEDweek Newsletter
Veteran insight on your federal pay, benefits, career and retirement!
Share