Federal Manager's Daily Report

Out of 50 service contracts issued in 2020, auditors found that 94 percent did not include position investigative requirements. Image: JHVEPhoto/Shutterstock.com

The VA’s “high rate of noncompliance with executive orders, federal regulations, or VA policies for vetting contractor employees” could put “employees, veterans, information, and information systems at increased risk,” an inspector general audit has said.

It said that VA policies require all contractor employees to complete a fingerprint criminal history check—rules stricter than government-wide policies that require a risk and national security sensitivity designation, fingerprint check, background investigation, evaluation, and adjudication only for those who will work less than 180 days in a year.

However, in a review of 50 service contracts issued in 2020, auditors found that 94 percent did not include position designation records that established the position investigative requirements, and 34 did not include language to communicate vetting requirements to the contractor. In a review of 286 contractor employees, 215 did not have evidence of completed fingerprint checks and 225 did not have evidence that a background investigation was completed by an investigative service provider, it said.

“Unvetted contractor employees increase the risks to the health and well-being of veterans and VA employees, as well as the efficiency and integrity of VA services, government property, and information,” the report said. It said for example that none 73 unarmed contractor security guards at one facility were vetted, 38 of whom had records “including arrests and convictions ranging from petty misdemeanors to felonies such as disorderly conduct, domestic abuse, physical and sexual assault, financial card fraud, and terroristic threats.”

The IG also found “long-standing disagreements” among various offices in VA regarding responsibilities for vetting contractors, and that directives and handbooks on vetting contractor employees “are outdated and include conflicting or inaccurate information regarding roles and responsibilities.” It said that management generally concurred with the report’s recommendations.

Senate Eyes Vote to Pay Federal Employees Working Unpaid

Series of Bills Offered to Address Shutdown’s Impact on Employees

Public Starting to Feel Impact of Shutdown, Survey Shows

OPM Details Coverage Changes, Plan Dropouts for FEHB/PSHB in 2026

Does My FEHB/PSHB Plan Stack Up? Here’s How to Tell

2025 TSP Rollercoaster and the G Fund Merry-go-Round

See also,

TSP Takes Step toward Upcoming In-Plan Roth Conversions

5 Steps to Protect Your Federal Job During the Shutdown

Over 30K TSP Accounts Have Crossed the Million Mark in 2025

The Best Ages for Federal Employees to Retire

Best States to Retire for Federal Retirees: 2025

2024 Federal Employees Handbook