Federal Manager's Daily Report

Agency purchases on goods and services through the General

Services Administration’s “multiple award schedule” program

rose from $4 to $32 billion in the last ten years, but

weaknesses in the agency’s contract analysis prevent it

from knowing if it gets the best price from vendors, the

Government Accountability Office has said.

It said GSA analyzes information provided by vendors on

discounts for other customers and recent sales data for

similar items, but in the past “GSA has not always used

pricing tools effectively,” and management controls to

ensure good pricing had been reduced.

Contract negotiators at four MAS acquisition centers use

a range of tools to get the best prices from vendors, but

GSA lacks the documentation needed to determine if the

prices were effectively negotiated on 60 percent of the

contracts for fiscal 2004, according to GAO-05-229.

It said the documentation was not enough to determine if

“negotiated prices were based on accurate, complete, and

current vendor information; adequate price analyses; and

reasonable price negotiations.”

One reason is that GSA has cut back on the use of audits

before and after a contract, on pricing information before

the contract was awarded, said GAO, adding that the tools

have helped GSA avoid or recover hundreds of millions in

the past but have dropped in usage from 154 in 1995 to 40

in 2004.

It said that in March of 2003, GSA’s acquisition quality

management measurement and improvement program started

the use of panels to negotiate prices for contracts and

review them for quality after awards were made, but that

these efforts have suffered from insufficient oversight.

For example, three of the MAS acquisition centers had

not reported results of their 2003 pre-negotiation panels,

which management needs to fix problems – one center that

accounted for 56 percent of fiscal 2004 sales has not

held a single pre-negotiation panel to secure the best

prices, and while the post-award quality reviews have

identified problems in contract documentation, they

failed to determine the cause, according to GAO.