
The MSPB has rejected an appeal by an employee in a case of alleged whistleblower retaliation on grounds that the personnel actions at issue were the same as in a prior appeal, even though the employee alleged they were based on whistleblowing activities not raised in the earlier appeal.
Case No. 2024 MSPB 15 involved a hearing officer’s rejection of a second “individual right of action” (IRA) retaliation complaint on grounds of “administrative efficiency”—that the case sought to re-litigate matters that were or could have been raised in the first one. The personnel actions that were alleged to be retaliatory were the same, the hearing officer ruled.
The merit board agreed, saying that the two cases involved the same “causes of action” that give an employee the right to seek relief at the MSPB from a personnel decision.
It cited its own precedent preventing an employee from “challenging, in a second IRA appeal, the same personnel actions that were the subject of a prior IRA appeal, despite the appellant’s assertion that he was challenging the personnel actions under a new legal theory.”
It added, though, that there would be no such bar against a second appeal “alleging that different personnel actions were taken in retaliation for protected disclosures that were raised in a prior IRA appeal,” because in that case the “cause of action” would not be the same.
Deferred Resignation Periods about to End for Many; Overall 12% Drop
Retirement Surge Likely as Deferred Resignation Periods End
Senate Rejects Bills to Defer Shutdown; Familiar Process Lies Just Ahead
Senate Bill Would Override Trump Orders against Unions
Report Describes Impact of Shutdown on Employees, Agencies
TSP Adds Detail to Upcoming Roth Conversion Feature
See also,
How to Handle Taxes Owed on TSP Roth Conversions? Use a Ladder
The Best Ages for Federal Employees to Retire
Best States to Retire for Federal Retirees: 2025