The GAO report comes at a time when the Office of Personnel Management is still working to issue regulations to carry out a 2003 change in law linking SES pay more closely to performance and while agencies are under pressure to use performance management systems, particularly those for senior execs, as a tool to better accomplish their missions. It also comes just as Congress is about to write the Transportation-Treasury appropriations bill for the upcoming fiscal year, which will be the most likely vehicle for decision on funding for the “human capital performance fund.” That fund-designed as a source of money to reward good performers across the government–was created last year at the White House’s request but Congress put just $1 million into it, effectively enough only to get it existing on paper. The White House’s budget proposal requested $300 million for the fund in fiscal 2005. But chances of approval could be dim, given the negative review by GAO and the executives themselves of what is in effect a trial system of pay for performance-along with the lack of rules so far from OPM on exactly how the performance fund would work and the lack of any congressional attention this year to performance pay.
Fedweek
Report Could Hurt Chances on Performance Fund
By: fedweek