A major argument being raised is that “attrition rates are high among those currently not receiving enhanced benefits" such as Postal Inspectors, VA police and certain IRS employees that carry. Image: Christopher Penler/Shutterstock.com
By: FEDweek StaffHigh attrition in federal positions that involve law enforcement duties but that are not included in the special retirement provisions for law enforcement officers is being used as a major argument for extending those benefits to those positions, says a report for Congress.
“Many employees in law enforcement occupations are not recognized as LEOs by their agencies and OPM, and consequently they are not eligible to receive enhanced retirement benefits,” the Congressional Research Service said.
Those enhanced benefits include a more generous basic retirement annuity calculation, and lesser age and years of service combinations to become eligible, the report notes; although coming at the cost of higher required contributions into the retirement system while working.
“Several employee groups and unions representing individuals in these occupations have sought enhanced benefits through additional legislation,” it says, for example to include: employees who investigate or apprehend individuals suspected or convicted of offenses against the criminal laws and carry firearms; IRS employees whose duties are primarily the collection of delinquent taxes and the securing of delinquent returns; employees of the Postal Inspection Service; VA police officers; and Customs and Border Protection seized property specialists.
In addition to the argument that they perform duties similar to those of employees who are covered by the special retirement provisions, it says, a major argument being raised is that “attrition rates are high among those currently not receiving enhanced benefits.”
“Incorporating additional occupations may address problems of attrition and perceived inequity across law enforcement-related positions,” it says.
The report did not specify differences in attrition rates, but vacancy rates have been a concern in general regarding CBP and VA officers especially. The NTUE union further recently warned of a surge in retirements upcoming in four years at CBP as officers who were first made eligible for those benefits in 2008 reach 20 years of service and will no longer accumulate benefits at the higher rate.
OPM Advises Agencies on Conducting RIFs During Shutdown
Updated Shutdown Contingency Plans Show Range of Impacts
Use Shutdown as Justification for More RIFs, OMB Tells Agencies
Unions Win a Round in Court Disputes over Anti-Representation Orders
Deferred Resignation Periods End for Many; Overall 12% Drop
Senate Bill Would Override Trump Orders against Unions
TSP Adds Detail to Upcoming Roth Conversion Feature
See also,
Legal: How to Challenge a Federal Reduction in Force (RIF) in 2025
How to Handle Taxes Owed on TSP Roth Conversions? Use a Ladder
The Best Ages for Federal Employees to Retire
Best States to Retire for Federal Retirees: 2025
Retention Standing, ‘Bump and Retreat’ and More: Report Outlines RIF Process
