Fedweek Legal

By passing the Congressional Accountability Act (CAA) in

1995, Congress made itself legally bound to follow many

of the same employment laws applicable to federal

agencies, such as the Civil Rights Act, the Family

Medical Leave Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Fair

Labor Standards Act, and others.


To defend against lawsuits in court, the Bipartisan

Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) is trying to limit the CAA’s

scope. BLAG, composed of state Representatives, filed

legal arguments claiming that under certain circumstances,

Congress cannot be sued in court. Specifically, BLAG

claims that when a personnel action relates to an

employee’s legislative duties, the action is excluded

from the CAA’s coverage. The Constitution provides that

members of Congress should be immune from any questioning

“for any Speech or Debate in either House”. BLAG argues

that the Speech or Debate limitation applies to any

personnel actions relating to a congressional employee’s

performance of legislative duties.


Recently, a federal appellate court rejected BLAG’s

arguments. The Tenth Circuit ruled that the Speech or

Debate “Clause protects only ‘legislative’ acts . . .

and only official, formal acts (or perhaps their

functional equivalent) deserve the adjective

‘legislative.’ … Because Plaintiff’s duties were not

legislative and personnel actions allegedly taken

against her were not in themselves legislative, her

CAA claim can proceed.” Bastien v. Office of Senator

Ben Nighthorse Campbell, 390 F.3d 1301, 1305-1306

(10th Cir. 2004).


Even though BLAG lost in the Tenth Circuit, it is

trying again in the D.C. Circuit. In Fields v. Office

of Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D.C. Cir. No. 04-5315,

the trial court rejected arguments similar to those

BLAG made in Bastien. BLAG has filed a brief in

support of Johnson’s appeal of that decision. (Only

BLAG’s Republican Members signed the brief). If the

D.C. Circuit rules differently than the Bastien court,

it is possible that this issue will reach the Supreme

Court.


This information is provided by the attorneys at

Passman & Kaplan, P.C., a law firm dedicated to the

representation of federal employees worldwide. For

more information on Passman & Kaplan, P.C., go to

fedweek.sparklist.com/t